What defines me?

Some people are questioning why I’m suddenly reading about string theory. To which my first though

Why I Normally Hate Prefaces

Some readers, I think, have ADD when it comes to reading. They are the sort of readers who simply wa

Okay, so I draw sometimes. [ART]

Oh man. So maybe I have one too many indoor hobbies. /Shrug. That's what you get when you grow up as

 

Why reading everything is my secret ingredient to creative social media strategy.

February 3, 2012 in Book Club, Geeky, Marketing, Social Media

michaelcrichton theandromedastrain heycheri lmfao1 Why reading everything is my secret ingredient to creative social media strategy. * heycheri sherilynn macale

Ahem. When reading interesting literature (or doing anything, really), I have this weird tendency to pause for annotation. I write down, bang out on a keyboard, or express through productive visuals whatever strange thought or memorable idea I’d like to reference at a later date. Fortunately, this nearly obsessive compulsive desire to categorize my personal experiences, individual ideas, and inspired thoughts usually works out in my favor. I say my favor and not everyone’s favor because, of course, the concept of what I consider to be a reward isn’t popularized through consensus.

But whatever.
The late Christopher Hitchens is famously known for approving of and, in fact, staunchly defending unique trains of thought, and I thank Alex Wilhelm, a former colleague of mine while working at The Next Web, for introducing me to this fascinating human.

Some quotes by Hitchens himself that seem responsible for the methods behind his own madness (and which also happen to now inspire & support my own philosophies):

“I don’t care. I don’t need a ‘seconder’. My own opinion is enough for me, and I claim the right to have it defended against any consensus, any majority, anywhere, any place, any time. And anyone who disagrees with this can pick a number, get in line, and kiss my ass.”

“Get people to think about why do they know what they already think they know? How do I know that I know this except that I’ve always been taught this and never heard anything else?”

“Don’t take refuge in the false security of consensus, and the feeling that whatever you think, you’re bound to be okay because you’re in the safely moral majority.”

So uh, y’know. Keep that philosophy in mind as you read my blog. I am one who believes that my genuine need to discover interesting philosophies and experiences while psychoanalyzing, through written explanation, the foundation of that interest for future reference — I believe that this is the routine behind which I derive most of my success. By archiving my experiences — no matter how minor the effect on my life — I am better able to analyze and understand myself, and routinely reward myself through generating the results I want again and again via these cataloged experiences.

Fortunately, the most rewarding form of self-analysis is, to me, the sort that benefits my career. And for some reason, reading and analyzing great literature fuels my instinct for developing creative social strategy (which is, basically, both what I do for a living and what I happen to do for fun). Of course, this is in combination with many different categories of rewards, but hey — if reading and writing make me better at my job, I ask, why-the-f*ck-not?

Sometimes, the strategies behind what produces particular results are more important than the actual results. For me, this proves true when it comes to how I best understand the mere approach to my own strategies, especially with the intent to produce some sort of profit or reward. Reading and devouring as much information as possible then analyzing and archiving my thought process during this experience better enables me to achieve expected or predicted results.

Take, for example, The Andromeda Strain.

The Andromeda Strain is a fiction novel by Michael Crichton who, through his amazing ability to spin a story out of nothing, spawned the following lengthy annotation from me, and helped me to better visualize my own basic understanding of marketing and advertising strategy (yes, I’m a visual thinker):

Waitaminute.

So does that mean that the animals and beings we know today are simply the cross-bred mutant babies of their bacterial ancestors? And since all living things, according to Michael Crichton — AKA, Book God — are simply organs coexisting within the same cell membrane, and that these organs are, wait for it, actually just smaller groups of cells and bacteria coexisting alongside other groups of cells and bacteria within other organs which coexist within other bodies?!

My mind is blown, Crichton, and you are responsible! /Shakes fist.

In a relevant trail of thought, two beings hoping to mate are merely two very separate yet absurdly populated masses of privately colonized and grown bacteria-within-bacteria-within-bacteria that are genetically able to coexist in the interest of replication. That is, by creating friction between one another to stimulate production and movement of liquid reproductive mutations (catalysts, by their actual definition) — multiplication occurs, and a similar set of bacteria-within-bacteria-within-bacteria grows to “life”.

It’s the chemically-compatible process of which passing down and multiplicative friction occurs in scientifically inevitable and interesting cross-genetic mutations.

Chemically speaking, it does matter how healthy and genetically superior you are. Eons of inter-species breeding have made it so.

Relating this to new experiences — or life, really, although I admit it might be a distant concept to grasp if your mind refuses to stretch this far — use your body to create personal and positive environmental friction between you and mutually beneficial outside forces. Do not simply interact with other bacterium in the way that history proves is accurate. Experiment to get even better results.

Understand the scientific cause and effect between you and your world, then manipulate the green return based on mutual benefit, or self preservation. This simple understanding of business exchange becomes the driving motto behind “earned reward”. Or in other words, “Here’s what I’m offering, and here’s what I deserve. If you can’t match that, then in the interest of self preservation, mutual benefit, and basic genetic success, I’m going to have to politely refuse. But thank you.”

Ho. Lee. Shit.

Yeah.
I realize that some of you might be lost at this point, so let me tie that all back in:

Reading is my catalyst for creative social media strategy.

Again, this is only from my perspective, so what works for me may not work for you, but …
When I discover new authors that I just absolutlely love or who very easily influence and inspire the way that I think in some minor way, I can’t help but rave about them. The artistic ability to craft words in an engaging and relatable manner is absolutely rare, and is, in my opinion, something that I feel should be praised. In the case above, I can’t help but worship Crichton’s surprisingly-pleasant instinct to, as the Washington Post says, “make the unbelievable believable.”

For example, reading Crichton then archiving my reaction has made me realize exactly what I’ve been hearing: “Creative Social Media Strategy is not a Science, it’s an Art.” By obsessively analyzing the styles of various writers and understanding how often they use which creative techniques (written or spoken, really) to produce different reactions, I am better able to mimic, predict, and reproduce expected results.

TL;DR

A good author (marketer/strategist) invokes longterm and positive reaction from his or her readers (target market) through consumer-facing and self-generated content (catalysts for productive-friction), through which more brilliant ideas are inspired and can therefore spawn (viral marketing). A good author merely proposes what he or she has to offer the world, and sees organic return based on what’s being offered in collaboration. Or in marketing terms, a good author pitches and lures his or her readers with what he or she believes is valuable to his or her target market or demographic, then sits back to see who takes the bait, then knows exactly what to do with that acquired crowd in order to best leverage profitability. And, amazingly enough, creative social media strategy is the practice of that art.

Now, whether that market is “quality” or not — this is irrelevant to advertisers who simply work with numbers. Anyone who’s been a Partner on YouTube or successfully runs their own ad-based Media site understands this basic concept. Congratulations to Facebook, by the way, on its recent IPO. It figured that concept out real fast and managed to capitalize on what social media really is, resulting in Facebook’s ridiculously impressive valuation.

*I can’t possibly be the only one who thinks this way. Out of sheer curiosity, do you often find yourself overanalyzing everything? I can’t be the only one who tries to understand why, why, and why, or how, how, and how. And if I am, then shit. I am happy to blame reading on helping to carve out the methods behind my own madness, and to help me grasp and understand my own basic philosophies behind what makes the universe tick.

No seriously,
Cheri

lol michaelcrichton theandromedastrain heycheri1 Why reading everything is my secret ingredient to creative social media strategy. * heycheri sherilynn macaleThe glorious expression used to create the first photo, which can be found by clicking here.

Social Media Management vs. Strategy – Is it really that simple?

January 30, 2012 in Entrepreneur, Marketing, Social Media

0022 Social Media Management vs. Strategy   Is it really that simple? * heycheri sherilynn macale

I can’t help the twinge of irritation I feel when I’m told, “Social media is so easy, a monkey could do it.”

Well, sure it is, in the sense that you can basically be anywhere and have a “presence” regardless of what sort of content you post. But to make that content profitable or return some sort of positive result — that’s where actual business strategy comes in. Encyclopedic research, constant testing, and aggressive networking through these channels, not to mention the ability to quickly and easily adjust to organic change in the social market — it’s all relevant.

On a phone call the other night with an old colleague of mine who remains within the small group of individuals I’ve grown to respect, I was describing a brief and tiny segment of social strategy that I know, through experience, to be both highly profitable and extremely effective. And while I normally respect his opinions on most things — including the odd bit of relationship advice — I found his response to my explanation to be somewhat ignorant.

As I was trailing on about my ideas during our Skype video chat, he teasingly made a jerking off motion with his hand, causing me to pause and react defensively with, “What is that supposed to mean?”
“Cheri,” he began, “social media is simple: Don’t be a dick.”
“Duh, but come on — there’s so much more beyond that when it comes to branding and presence. No one just starts off being the center of a million networks through social media. It takes–!” I stopped and stuttered suddenly when he repeated the same colorful hand motion, shocked (as I normally am when he does this) that he would challenge what I passionately feel to be correct. Of course, I laughed and rolled my eyes in defeat, deciding that, at this point, my rant on the topic would only fall on deaf ears.

This explains why you are suddenly looking at one massive entry on social media management versus strategy.
Hoorah.

Some companies and people still don’t get it.

Would you say that social media is “simple”? Or do you, like me, understand or feel passionate about the various creative strategies one can employ in order to manipulate return on investment and profitability?

Let me give you some examples of companies I’ve worked on or have become acquainted with that simply do not understand social media nor what an established presence on various platforms can do for its reputation.

While working with several startups or companies, etc in the past, I’ve heard various complaints that simply annoy me. Not because I’m easily irritable, but because when I see the problems presented, I’ve already done enough research, written my own analysis, and have enough experience with those issues to address it and iterate on the situations directly. If a problem can be solved now and if I am an employee willing to undertake that responsibility, not to mention my proven track record for success, why turn down free and effective labor?

One company I briefly worked for, for example, failed to see the profitability in one extremely engaged social media presence and so kept this potential profit “on the back burner”. This low-priority mindset towards social media is, naturally, something I continue to laugh about to this day — especially with the fantastic results companies who’ve leapt onto the social media trend early are already producing. Of course, the internal team culture at this particular brand was absolutely awful (from my perspective, anyway), so I chalk up their ignorant view on the importance of social media as a sign that the company simply did not understand how to run its own business with an open mind towards emerging markets and trends, much less manage its own employees in a way that would produce more profitable results.

Another company I tested the waters with just didn’t seem to get the big picture, and didn’t seem to understand that social media is not just simply tweeting or simply posting a link on Facebook. In particular, I was told, “Video content doesn’t do well with us, Cheri. It just doesn’t have a high enough return for us to invest in it.” To which my response was, of course, that the reason video wasn’t doing well for them was because they hadn’t bothered to invest in it. To prove my point, I brought up several case studies where video was extremely profitable for other companies, outlining the strategies behind those cases as well as the reasons why they were able to make these strategies profitable. Then, as I often do when proposing something I am passionate about, I offered to undertake the development of this company’s severely-lacking video content strategy for no charge, in addition to my current workload, and with no increase in my actual salary.

Again, I was turned down even with a solid proposal.
How this makes sense still continues to baffle me.

First, understand the basics of what the bare minimum in social media is.

Video content, Twitter, Facebook, Google+, SEO, social media ROI, emerging social platforms, community culture, quality leads, influencers, the networks of those influencers, the mutual benefits of partnering with other influencers, the relationship between companies and press, the ability to network and develop relationships both in person with current or potential clients, combined with the ability to translate all of that into the face of a company’s social media presence — Is  all of this really “simple”?

I argue the contrary.

There are some community managers, along with those who claim to be “social media strategists”, who feel that, yes, social media is simple, and also happen to think that they can get by with doing the bare minimum. Again, a tweet here, a Facebook post there, a reply to a comment wherever — these are people who are merely scraping the surface of what social media has to offer, and who I would hardly call “strategists”.

Likewise, for any established social media presence (be it a public figure, company, or brand of some sort), social media can also be simple. These people have put the work in that it takes to market whatever idea, product, or service it happens to be selling, and due to the work it has invested in its campaigns through both social media and traditional marketing, these companies or brands can now sit back, relax, and allow the wealth of content to do the networking for it based on reputation alone.

*I believe I wrote an article lightly touching on the subject in the past called “Passive Networking“, a social media term of my own invention that involves putting in the hard work earlier on in order to establish your social “face” or “voice”, after which you can relax and let the profits come in through organic means.

Social media strategy – this is a completely different game.

Social Media Management vs. Social Media Strategy

Social media management is what one does when a company’s social presence is already established, and is at the level of profitability and engagement that the company has come to expect through this method. This is probably the easiest job any social media enthusiast can ever land, and is, in my mind, akin to lazy community management. For me, this is the sort of job that doesn’t present enough creatively challenging situations to keep me motivated, and is one that is entirely too routine to satisfy my aggressive mindset.

Social media strategy, however, involves the creative development of techniques, projects, and activities followed by effective execution — all designed to create a social reputation for a company out of nothing, while understanding how to put that reputation in the right hands and in front of the right eyes in order to both aggressively hype and spread that same reputation. It’s a combination of marketing, PR, media outreach, community management, business development, etc. — it takes complete dedication, especially when crafting a strategy for a company which has absolutely none.

With this in mind, I’d argue that sure, social media can be simple for those who are simply existing on it without the aggressive ambition towards developing more positive results in the future. Sure, social media is simple for those who are merely content with whatever current presence they already have.

But for those who crave more, for those who are willing to put in the work towards growing their presence while understanding the ins and outs, the various case studies available, the wealth of knowledge one can devour related to the social space, and the creative strategies one can employ to, again, manipulate the current social trends for positive return — social media and the various platforms available to practice it represent one massive and creative playground for the passionate marketer or strategist.

But, with a shrug I ask, what do I know?

0015 Social Media Management vs. Strategy   Is it really that simple? * heycheri sherilynn macale

Oh well.

I get it. Not everyone is as crazy about this new form of marketing as I am.

I was told during a meeting the other week that my understanding of this space and my passion for it represents a new skill set that simply cannot be taught in school, and because of my interesting/extensive background experience and, again, proven track record for success, I make one ideal candidate for social media strategy. Of course, this is a subject that I am so deathly passionate about that I simply cannot help spouting off about it at every turn. And yet, because it is so “new”, I often find my rants to be the subject of criticism even by the people I’ve grown to respect — much like my colleague’s hand-motion reaction to my social strategy explanation earlier on in this entry.

Knowing this, I look forward to the day when social media can become one truly measurable science, and to the moment the social “scene” is globally accepted as a profitable investment by companies, politicians (Obama had a head start on this, of course, and won because of it), public figures, brands, and whoever else I’m missing that might potentially benefit from this free and open social playground.

But until then, I am perfectly content with being seen as overly obsessed with social media strategy.
As the saying goes, “First!”

Always,
XOXO Cheri XOXO

Reuben Katz, CEO and Co-Founder at Geeklist, on Fear and Failure

January 29, 2012 in Advice, Entrepreneur

0014 Reuben Katz, CEO and Co Founder at Geeklist, on Fear and Failure * heycheri sherilynn macale

“Failure is relative to expectations. It doesn’t really exist if you don’t let it. Therein lies happiness. I’ve lived through so much in 15 years of startups, businesses, entrepreneur ups, downs, wins, losses – If I ever feared failure or even allowed it to enter my mind, I’d have gone and gotten a job long ago.”

– Reuben Katz, CEO and Co-Founder at Geeklist, via Twitter

In my time becoming acquainted with the tech community and during my work with The Next Web, I’ve dined, drank, met, and “kicked the shit” with several entrepreneurs who, as I mention in the journal entry above, are people who I’ve grown to both respect and admire for their successes in combination with their very human failures.

To echo the ideas of my previous blog post, I tend to respect those who have a certain ambitious quality about them; a free-thinking, off-color and unabashed ability to shamelessly go after what they want while seeming completely oblivious to failure. This unconcerned mindset should not be confused with ignorance, of course, because in order to reach this level of oblivion, one must first overcome again and again this demon called “fear”.

Being someone who has obviously had to overcome fear and failure on several occasions — my decade-long history in blogging providing several examples of this, I’m sure — I’ve developed my own line of thinking when it comes to the subject. On my Facebook profile, for example, you will find the following quote:

“The people who we perceive to be the happiest are those who go about their lives as if unfazed by failure, and who strive with an astonishing regularity towards improving themselves while in the presence of negativity. Not to mention the fact that not only do they appear to be getting better at whatever it is they are doing, but they also seem to stop and help others along the way.”

*This quote is something I drummed up through my own rambling ages ago, then tucked away in the digital space for reminiscing at a later date. Like right now, obviously. And yes, while I’m sure it’s quite vain to sit around quoting myself when I’m suddenly struck with genius, I argue: what is writing if not the constant quoting of oneself?

reuben Reuben Katz, CEO and Co Founder at Geeklist, on Fear and Failure * heycheri sherilynn macaleReuben, who I only happen to know through a chance meeting with his Co-Founder, Christian Sanz (we shared hot tater tots and Chardonnay at Town Hall Restaurant while discussing the future of Geeklist), saw my quote when I tweeted it out earlier today, and responded in kind. And as most of you probably realize by now, I am obsessed with constantly quoting and analyzing the objectively amazing things that other people say, and desperately felt the need to write down Reuben’s words of wisdom.

Again, just the — and I’m quoting the reviews of my readers here when I say this — “prolific writer” in me acting out.

Now, the reason I am sharing Reuben’s quote with you is to add weight to the same philosophy that I am constantly preaching here on my blog while also hoping to drive it home a bit deeper. That is, you hold the reigns to your life, and you are in complete control of your future. The decisions you make on a day to day basis are what will determine your path as you age, grow in success, or “fail” (if there is such a thing as failure, really). This is the same for the every day man, for the would-be entrepreneur, and even the CEO.

To leave you with another quote, courtesy of Elisa Melendez, a fellow Frag Doll Cadette (if you can remember that far back into my career history):

“Power is not something that is had and given—it is something that is negotiated through everyday actions. [Be] strong and conscious of your own agency and your ability to negotiate power.”

As always,
XOXO Cheri XOXO

@heycheri / Facebook / Google+ / Blog / Pics